Home
/
Esports
/
Match analysis
/

Why banning mercy makes no sense in competitive play

Mercy Bans | Players Divided on Competitive Viability

By

Marcus Huang

Apr 28, 2025, 02:24 PM

Edited By

Omar Ali

Updated

Apr 28, 2025, 06:12 PM

2 minutes of duration

A digital character resembling Mercy from Overwatch, performing a healing action in a colorful gaming environment.

A fierce debate among gamers regarding Mercy's role in Overwatch rages on, with significant voices advocating for her ban and others pushing back. As of April 2025, the conversation has attracted over 30 new comments, revealing deeper layers to the ongoing argument about character strength and ban strategies.

Context: The Current Landscape of the Debate

Despite being categorized as a low-tier hero, many players find banning Mercy perplexing. A long-time Mercy main stated that banning her often hinders team dynamics more than it helps. They noted, "Banning Mercy is, to me, essentially shooting yourself in the foot."

Key Themes Emerging from Player Comments

Three prevailing points emerged in recent discussions:

  1. Ban Decisions Simplified

    Many comments highlighted the simplicity behind banning decisions, with some players admitting, "There are just two steps involved in the ban decision: I don't like hero X. I ban hero X."

  2. Frustration with Pocketed Heroes

    Increased emphasis has been placed on the challenge of playing against pocketed hitscan characters like Sojourn or Ashe, with one player stating, "Playing GM games with a pocketed hitscan is so awful."

  3. Misconceptions About Mercy

    Some players argued that Mercy's perceived power is often overblown. One pointed out, "Her healing isnโ€™t good; she has vulnerable windows out the wazoo." They reiterated that if players struggle against her, it may reflect more on their own skill than on her capabilities.

Voices from the Community

"Banning Mercy over Ana never fails to annoy me."

This comment encapsulates the sentiments of many who believe stronger heroes deserve bans. Another player argued that the main goal should be strategic, saying, "Ideally, you could ban Sojourn, Ashe, and Widow, but by banning Mercy, you've kneecapped all of the above heroes in one hit."

Sentiment Patterns

Overall, reactions remain mixed, balancing frustration and tactical discussions. Those focused on higher-level play seem generally more strategic, while casual players often express exasperation at banning her.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ Many players see banning Mercy as short-sighted, especially in high-level matches.

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ Simplified ban strategies are common, with some admitting they aim to target disliked heroes instead of the most effective ones.

  • ๐Ÿ”น "Players think theyโ€™re making Mercy mains sad and that makes them happy," highlighting some of the emotional layers in the debate.

As the discussion continues, players across different ranks wrestle with the strategies involved in banning and selecting heroes, revealing ongoing challenges related to team dynamics and individual perceptions.