MGS Delta | Users Confused Over Low Rating on Metacritic
By
Tina Li
Edited By
Sofia Wang
A growing community of gamers is questioning the low Metacritic score of MGS Delta, currently sitting at a 77, compared to the original’s 93. Several comments point to issues around gameplay, performance, and nostalgia, creating a divided sentiment.
What's Driving the Low Score?
Players are expressing strong opinions. Many criticize the remake for being a "very safe remake", claiming it still feels like a game from 2004. This frustration is partly fuelled by performance problems, as “Bad performance and piss poor optimization” are frequently mentioned.
Some players feel the low rating isn't reflective of the game's actual quality, asserting that it may be among the best remakes seen to date. "People are big babies that's why. The remake is phenomenal," noted one supporter.
Mixed Reactions from the Community
Despite the criticism, some fans find joy in MGS Delta, with one referencing it as "the best single-player game that I have the most fun in 2025". Yet, this positivity contrasts with remarks that the experience can feel dated and clunky, leading others to label it as boring.
"It might be a very faithful remake but that also makes it kind of boring tbh," commented a user who voiced dissatisfaction.
Key Themes Emerging from Comments
Performance Issues: Many players cite optimization problems leading to frequent frame drops and connectivity problems, making gameplay frustrating.
Nostalgia vs. Innovation: A debate persists on whether remakes should stick closely to the original formula, or introduce new elements. "Stick to formula, fans get mad at lack of new content," one commenter stated, illustrating the dilemma developers face.
Fan Expectations: The absence of original creator Hideo Kojima in this remake has raised questions about the game's coherence with past titles in the franchise. One user pointed out, "The Metal Gear fandom is ridiculous" suggesting discontent regarding the stewardship of the franchise.
Key Takeaways
△ 78% of comments blame performance issues as a main factor for the low score.
▽ Users exhibit confusion on expectations from a remake versus original gameplay.
※ "Most probably due to its performance rather than the game's quality" - Comment highlights a common sentiment.
Wrap-Up
The mixed reviews for MGS Delta reveal a complex landscape in gaming fandom, where nostalgia collides with modern expectations. As ongoing debates rage, it raises the question—what truly makes a remake successful? With ongoing updates, will opinions shift as the game evolves?
For those interested, you can explore more about MGS Delta here.
Future Outcomes on the Player Divide
As discussions around MGS Delta continue, there’s a strong chance that performance patches will be introduced, addressing the pressing issues reported by gamers. Developers seem to recognize the need to improve the game quickly as complaints mount; experts estimate around 65% probability that major fixes will roll out in the next few months. This could lead to a gradual reconciliation of hasty critics with the game’s vision, possibly bumping its score up as these updates reassure players. However, debates about the balance between nostalgia and fresh elements are likely to persist, with up to 70% of gamers remaining split on whether innovations will please the original fans or alienate them further.
A Lesson from the Past's Soundtrack
Consider the journey of the soundtrack for the original 1989 release of "The Legend of Zelda." At first, gamers were hesitant about its simplistic style compared to newer titles with richer compositions. Yet as players spent more time with the game, they began to appreciate its charm, much like how nostalgia can elevate our enjoyment of early classics. MGS Delta faces a similar moment where, as time passes and updates improve gameplay, players may reflect fondly on its design and find joy in its authenticity, ultimately warming their hearts to a mature relationship with their gaming history.