Edited By
Julia Forester

A community of gamers is questioning the strategy of maximizing affinity in Monster Hunter Wilds. As players explore Latent Power builds, the debate heats up on whether it's better to prioritize full Weakness Exploit or consider alternatives like Agitator for optimal damage output early in quests.
As newcomers dive into Monster Hunter with Wilds, a prevalent theory involves balancing affinity with raw damage. Players like one enthusiast are contemplating the effectiveness of running full Weakness Exploit (WEX) versus investing in other skills that boost overall damage when Latent Power is activated. The initial analysis spotlights the faction of gamers optimizing builds in anticipation of different damage scenarios.
Three main themes emerge from ongoing discussions:
Affinity vs. Raw Attack: Many players are realizing that achieving 100% affinity may not yield the best damage. One gamer noted, "At around 80% affinity, you gain a bit more overall damage output from pumping raw than going to max affinity."
Skill Over Cap: There are suggestions to utilize level 4 slots for skills like resentment instead of solely focusing on overcapping affinity. This brings a more nuanced approach to gear setups and skill investments.
Game-Specific Strategies: Newcomers are advised that while theory crafting is essential, adapting strategies to each game iteration is critical. One comment highlighted, "Your theory crafting is not theoretically wrong; itโs just better suited to MHWorlds."
Overall, reactions show a positive outlook on strategizing around affinity with several players eager to test these theories in-game. The community thrives on discussing innovative builds.
"Shooting for 100% affinity isnโt optimal?" - Surprised commenter
๐น 80% Affinity: Offers a sweet spot for damage output.
๐ธ Avoiding Overcaps: Players should consider total damage rather than just affinity boosts.
โญ Community Insight: "Attack has more merit here than affinity." - Valuable input from a knowledgeable player.
Gaming enthusiasts in Wilds find themselves at a crossroads; will they stick to traditional strategies or innovate based on community findings? As conversations continue, the strategies will likely evolve further.