Edited By
Liam Chen
A discussion has emerged in gaming forums as players reflect on games they've fully completed. Many share their pride in hitting that elusive 100% mark, but questions about how they achieved it are stirring debate.
Some commenters have noted that earlier titles in franchises, such as Assassin's Creed, do not feature achievements, leading others to question how some players claim 100% completion. One commenter pointed out, "Assassins Creed 1 to Brotherhood doesnโt even have achievements?" This confusion highlights potential inconsistencies in how completion rates are determined across platforms.
Players share diverse strategies for achieving 100% in their games:
System Sorting: One individual explained that sorting games by percentage helps display those with 100% achievements. This could mislead newcomers unaware of the sorting option.
Collectibles and Synchronization: Another player aims for complete synchronization and collectible collection as a way to measure completion, saying, "I looked for 100% syncro, all collectibles, and all content."
Play Style Variances: Different games call for different strategies. While some aim for every achievement, others avoid those deemed too challenging, like specific gameplay challenges.
Despite the debate, enthusiasts celebrate their achievements. A player expressed joy for their favorite game, saying, "Probably RDR2. Cuphead is also special since itโs the only game I kept playing purely for fun."
"Nice list dude, congrats. Whatโs your favorite game there?"
This camaraderie underscores the shared passion among gamers, regardless of the controversies around completion metrics.
๐น Confusion About Achievements: Players question how some complete titles lacking achievement systems.
๐ธ Diverse Strategies: Varied techniques reflect personal gaming styles and approaches to oversight.
โจ Community Support: Shared achievements foster a sense of unity and pride among gamers.
As the conversation continues, the gaming community remains engaged in exploring both the joy and the complexities of achieving full completion in their favorite titles.
As the gaming community continues to debate achievement metrics, there's a strong chance we'll see developers address the inconsistencies in how completion rates are defined. Gamers demand clarity, and experts estimate around 60% of titles could include in-game indicators to measure progress more accurately in the coming years. Given the competitive nature of gaming and the impact of community feedback, platforms may evolve to implement standardized achievement systems. This could enhance player experience and potentially lead to new competitions and events centered around completion percentages, reshaping how gamers engage with their favorite titles.
Looking back, the rise of online multiplayer games, particularly during the early 2000s, presented a similar scenario. Just as gamers debated fairness and skill measurement in competitive play, this new discourse on completion standards parallels those conversations. Gamers felt the pressure to perform based on how others defined success, often resulting in backlash against titles that didn't fit traditional norms. This historical context reveals that, like the evolution of competitive play, current discussions will likely lead to foundational changes in player dynamics, fostering unity and innovation across the gaming landscape.