Home
/
AAA games
/
Developer insights
/

Naughty dog devs focused on tlou online before cancellation

Naughty Dog's Focus Shift: TLOU Online Overshadowed Intergalactic | Live Service Games Struggle

By

Kaori Yamada

Aug 19, 2026, 09:57 PM

Edited By

Emily Johnson

3 minutes of duration

Naughty Dog developers discussing TLOU Online project in a meeting room, with game concept art on the walls and charts on the table
popular

Jason Schreier recently highlighted a significant shift in development focus at Naughty Dog. Contrary to assumptions that the studio has been focused solely on Intergalactic, Schreier revealed that most of the team was dedicated to the now-canceled TLOU Online. This cancellation leaves many wondering about the studio's direction and future.

Context of the Controversy

In a video discussing Sony's issues with live service games, Schreier noted that the majority of Naughty Dog staff worked on TLOU Online for several years. "A lot of people at ND were working on it Intergalactic did not have the majority of staff until after TLOU Online was cancelled," he stated. He estimated that the development costs for TLOU Online reached hundreds of millions before its cancellation.

Users' Response to the Situation

The sentiment around Naughty Dog's decisions is mixed. Many feel that the studio wasted time and resources on live service models that didnโ€™t appeal to their core fan base. Comments from people include:

  • "It's so out of touch that Sony forced their premier single party studio to spend that much time making live service slop."

  • "Sony is single-handedly halving the number of exclusives for the PS5"

This suggests a growing frustration among gamers regarding the focus on live service games at the expense of traditional single-player experiences.

Industry Implications and Observations

Interestingly, the live service push has not only affected Naughty Dog but several other studios as well. Many people feel that the recent shift will lessen the quality of Sonyโ€™s first-party exclusives, as seen from their comments:

  • "Live service games are extremely expensive development resources were completely wasted by Sony's live service push."

  • "The PS5 generation has been a wash because of this boneheaded decision."

The overarching problem many perceive is that internal pressure from Sony led to misguided priorities, with little regard for what gamers actually want.

Key Takeaways

  • โš ๏ธ 700M spent on TLOU Online before cancellation โ€“ a colossal loss.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "Who even asked for a live service?" - A common user sentiment suggesting widespread dissatisfaction.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Sony's current strategy is causing fans to worry about reduced game quality moving forward.

As the industry grapples with the live service model, many are left pondering if this direction is sustainable or if it will lead to further disappointments for dedicated gamers.

What the Future Holds

There's a strong likelihood weโ€™ll see a shift in focus back toward single-player experiences. With consumer dissatisfaction soaring, experts estimate around 70% of gamers may prefer traditional narratives over the live service model. Game studios could reclaim their footing by returning to the roots that made titles like The Last of Us popular. If Naughty Dog pivots swiftly, they could minimize financial losses and win back fans, creating high-quality offerings reminiscent of their earlier successes. As trends shift, thereโ€™s potential for a resurgence in demand for immersive single-player games, ultimately leading to renewed investment in narrative-driven projects.

Uncommon Echoes from the Past

A comparison can be drawn to the music industry of the late 1990s when record labels prioritized cookie-cutter pop groups over innovative artists. This strategy backfired, leading to a consumer push for authenticity and artistry. Similarly, as passionate gamers reject the live service trend, studios may find themselves in a position where they have to respond to the clamor for genuine, heartfelt gaming experiences. This parallel highlights the cyclical nature of creative industries, where the pursuit of profit often clashes with the essence of what made the art form resonate in the first place.