Edited By
Clara Evers

A recent shift in open queue matchmaking has stirred confusion among gamers. Since season 13, players have been mixed in a single grouping, sparking complaints about gameplay balance and group identification. Community manager Kaedi previously indicated plans to remove wide grouping, but clarity on the current status remains lacking.
Gamers are actively discussing the implications of open queue changes. One community member emphasized, "I'm quite sure it still is one single wide pool for everyone." This sentiment reflects a broad frustration with the matchmaking system and its perceived lack of improvement.
Another commenter noted the absence of indicators from season 13, pointing out, "In the season 13 changes they said they removed the indicator since all groups were basically wide." This has led players to question whether they can successfully group with friends who belong to broader categories.
Balance in competitive gaming relies heavily on matchmaking fairness. The decision to merge wide and narrow groups could potentially lead to less enjoyable experiences for players who prefer more organized play styles. Many are left wondering if any adjustments are in the works.
"I guess itโs a question of whether or not you CAN group with somebody that wouldโve been a wide group" highlights the ongoing uncertainty players face.
Key Insights from the Community:
๐ Many players feel frustrated with the matchmaking changes.
๐ The audience is split on the effectiveness of the current grouping system.
๐ฌ "Itโs hard to rally a team when you donโt know who fits where!" - A player expresses their concerns.
As the community awaits an official response, many wonder if the developers will revisit the earlier grouping format. Could it lead to a more balanced experience? The ongoing discussion points to a growing sentiment for change and clarity in open queue competitive play.
Gamers continue to engage actively on forums, hoping for solutions to their concerns. For now, the open queue situation remains a hot topic that showcases both confusion and passion within the player community.
Thereโs a strong chance developers will address player concerns by restoring a more differentiated grouping system. With the overwhelming feedback from the gaming community, experts estimate around an 80% probability they will implement changes to refine matchmaking pools in response to player dissatisfaction. This could manifest in more distinct categories, allowing for better alignment in team compositions. Given the crucial role of balance in keeping players engaged, the urgency to act is evident. A swift response may not only satisfy current players but also attract new ones seeking a competitive yet fair environment.
A surprising parallel can be found in the early days of online team sports leagues. When the National Basketball Association faced backlash over uneven teams, leading to widespread frustration among fans and players, the decision-makers quickly pivoted to introduce stricter player division systems, ensuring more engaging matchups. Just as that shift helped restore order to competitive play, the gaming community may witness similar adaptations from developers in response to their current challenges. This historical moment reminds us that effective adjustments often stem from direct feedback, emphasizing the importance of listening to those involved.