Home
/
Gaming news
/
Game reviews
/

Why isn't the pigs perk used more in gameplay?

Debate Sparks Over Underused Killer Perk | Community Questions Effectiveness

By

Kota Yamamoto

May 27, 2026, 12:53 PM

Edited By

Carlos Gomez

3 minutes of duration

A visual representation of the Pigs Perk with a focus on a ranged killer like Deathslinger, showcasing tactical gameplay elements.
popular

A rising discussion on forums has players questioning why the killer perk "Make Your Choice" remains largely unused in gameplay. Following recent theories around its effectiveness, users shared insights about the perk's limitations, especially in competitive contexts, leading to a broader conversation about the choice of perks in general.

The perk activates when a survivor unhooks another from a hook while the killer is at least 32 meters away. It causes the unhooked survivor to scream, revealing their location, and also places them in the Exposed status for a limited time. Some players praise the perk's potential, noting it can be beneficial for killers like Deathslinger. However, a plethora of comments reveal skepticism about its practicality.

Why Is "Make Your Choice" Overlooked?

  1. More Effective Alternatives: Conversations highlight that other perks, such as Chucky's "Friends 'til the End", offer immediate objectives right after a hook, making them more appealing. A player remarked, "Some perks have just better effects."

  2. Limitations of Exposed Status: The Exposed status seems less impactful in scenarios where killers prioritize returning to hooks rather than chasing exposed survivors. One user stated, "Tunneling works better the distance requirement is too much.โ€

  3. Tactical Constraints: Critics argue that the perk encourages a proxy camping style that isn't always practical or rewarding. Commenters shared their experiences, stating, "Itโ€™s going to be pretty much an empty perk slot."

Community Insights and Perspectives

Curiously, discussions note that even effective killers struggle with the perk's mechanics. A player explained that, "Once people learn you have MYC, they're likely gonna wait to unhook until you're in chase." They argue the time constraint and need for awareness often lead to missed opportunities.

Interestingly, while some users defend the perk as underrated, stating it worked well before the introduction of newer options, others remain firm in their stance that it lacks value in the current meta.

Key Points from the Discussion

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Many players prefer stronger perks over "Make Your Choice"

  • ๐Ÿšจ Critiques emphasize the perk's requirement for situational awareness

  • ๐Ÿค” Several players question the necessity of pursuing unhooked survivors when alternatives exist

The evolving sentiment suggests that unless a significant buff or rework occurs, "Make Your Choice" will likely remain on the sidelines in favor of more efficient gameplay strategies.

Shifts on the Horizon for Killer Perks

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that as players continue to vocalize their frustrations, developers will consider tweaking "Make Your Choice" for improved viability. Experts estimate around a 60% likelihood of a balance adjustment in the next update cycle, which could enhance its effectiveness or reduce competitive alternatives. This kind of response to community feedback has occurred before, as players have shown an ability to influence game mechanics. If developers recognize the perk's shortcomings, they may introduce measures that make it more appealing among the current meta, potentially shifting player preference.

Lessons from Past Adaptations in Gaming

This situation draws a striking parallel to the early days of competitive MOBAs, where champions with unique mechanics often fell by the wayside due to the dominance of more effective options. Consider the character of Teemo in League of Legends; despite his quirky abilities, he was often overlooked until a series of buffs shifted player perception. Just as Teemo's unique playstyle found a renewed appreciation, "Make Your Choice" could see a revival if developers commit to redefining its role in gameplay. This demonstrates how sometimes it takes time for innovative ideas to catch on, even in a landscape marked by rapid evolution.