
Amid growing frustrations about server dependency, gamers are demanding offline functionality for a popular title. Many believe developers should shift to peer-to-peer connections or allow offline play entirely, stressing significant accessibility concerns.
With an increase in players expressing anger over server issues, the community is uniting in calls for alternatives. Recent comments signal rising frustration, particularly concerning developer communication and future support.
Game Delisting Anger: Players express outrage, stating, "They delist the game without warning; they donโt care about us. Insanity, screw them."
XP Concerns Amplified: Comments have highlighted long-standing worries about XP earning, especially for offline play and co-op modes. A player noted, "Lowering XP payouts for co-op was a huge mistake."
Couch Co-Op Desire: The community continues to request offline couch co-op features, aiming to enhance the social aspect of the game. One user stated, "It'd be a shame if you could no longer even play the game offline."
"If you can't see the writing on the walls at this point, Iโm sorry but youโre a fool man," expressed one frustrated player, indicating a sense of impending server closure.
Overall, the tone is predominantly negative. Players feel abandoned and question the developers' commitment, yet they remain resilient and vocal about their desire for change.
๐ฅ "They couldnโt even meet the absolute minimum" - Reflecting on the lack of updates.
โ ๏ธ Community increasingly anxious about potential game delisting.
๐ฎ "Would be nice to see offline couch co-op functionality too" - highlights interest in multiplayer alternatives.
As the situation unfolds, gamers continue to advocate for meaningful changes that could reshape their gaming experience. The push for offline gameplay demonstrates community strength in the face of server challenges that threaten their enjoyment.