Home
/
Gaming news
/
Game reviews
/

Why do players dislike the imbue paladin deck?

Why the Imbue Paladin Deck Sparks Controversy | Community Divided Over Its Viability

By

Mila Novak

Jun 17, 2025, 12:53 PM

Edited By

Emma Collins

2 minutes of duration

Group of players sharing opinions on Imbue Paladin deck gameplay in a competitive environment

A heated discussion is brewing in the gaming community as players voice their strong opinions against the Imbue Paladin deck. Complaints have emerged regarding its perceived lack of skill requirement, long gameplay times, and a controversial dragon card. This ongoing debate has players debating its place in the current meta.

The Deck in Focus

Players are dissatisfied with the deck for various reasons. One gamer, reaching Diamond rank, expresses confidence in their adjustments but notes, "I do not think this deck is OP." Meanwhile, others assert that the deck introduces fewer challenges compared to others, with one commenting, "Lack of skill needed. I refuse to play it."

Key Issues Raised

  1. Gameplay Duration: Games featuring the Imbue Paladin deck often stretch over ten minutes on average. Many feel this leads to a tedious playing experience, with one player noting, "My imbued games were like 5 mins tops," highlighting the contrast.

  2. Skill Requirements: Critics argue that the deck requires minimal skill to master, prompting some players to switch to alternatives like Priest. A forum user stated, "Itโ€™s all subjective imo if you love it then no oneโ€™s opinion should really matter."

  3. Balancing Concerns: The Imbue Paladin's dragon card is particularly contentious, with a commenter claiming, "That thing is completely out of whack." This perception has gamers questioning the deck's balance amid other more challenging options.

"It makes every game 10+ minute slog fest" - An Imbue Paladin player

Emerging Sentiment Patterns

The discussion features a blend of opinions:

  • Criticism of Gameplay Duration: Many lament the extended matches, which some see as a detriment to competitive play.

  • Diverse Skill Levels Acknowledged: Players of different skill levels respond variably, aligning with critiques or defenses of the deck.

  • Controversial Card Mechanics: The inclusion of the dragon card keeps players on their toes, stirring debates about balance.

Key Insights

  • โœฆ The Imbue Paladinโ€™s gameplay is criticized for its lengthy matches.

  • โœฆ Players express varied opinions on its skill requirements and effectiveness.

  • โœฆ Contentious cards within the deck raise concerns over balance and fairness.

As this debate continues on user boards while the community weighs its options, what path will players ultimately choose? The conversation surrounding the Imbue Paladin deck certainly keeps the excitement alive.

What Lies Ahead for the Imbue Paladin Deck

As discussions about the Imbue Paladin deck continue, itโ€™s likely that weโ€™ll see updates aimed at addressing player concerns. Thereโ€™s a strong chance game developers will tweak the dragon card to balance gameplay, with experts estimating around 60% probability that changes will emerge in the next patch. Meanwhile, if sentiment around lengthy matches persists, some players may pivot to more dynamic decks, perhaps reflecting a shift towards faster-paced gameplay. Overall, community feedback may lead to an environment that favors continuous adaptation, shaping how players approach strategy in the future.

A Surprising Reflection from Sports

An unexpected parallel can be drawn from the world of professional sports, specifically the controversy surrounding the introduction of the three-point line in basketball. Initially met with mixed feelings, many argued that it diminished traditional play. Over time, however, teams adjusted, incorporating the new strategy while still valuing classic methods. Just as fans of basketball found balance, gamers may evolve their tactics in response to the Imbue Paladin deck, leading to a whole new approach to deck-building and gameplay, marrying both innovative and traditional strategies.