Home
/
Esports
/
Match analysis
/

Why is ranking up in stadium slower as mercy?

Ranking Slower as Mercy: Is It Fair? | Players Debate Calibration Bonuses

By

Tina Li

Jun 10, 2025, 07:44 PM

Edited By

Dominic Crown

2 minutes of duration

A screenshot showing a character named Mercy in a game called Stadium, with another character next to her, highlighting their performance differences

In a recent discussion on forums, a player expressed frustration over ranking disparities in gameplay when playing as Mercy. Despite performing at MVP levels consistently, they noted their partner, who switched roles from DPS to Support, rapidly climbed ranks while they remained stuck.

The Climb to Pro Rank

This situation has sparked debates about the ranking system in competitive play. The player, initially ranked Pro 2, has found themselves oscillating between Pro 1 and Pro 2, while their partner surged from Rookie 5 to Pro 1 within a similarly timed period. Players wonder if the calibration bonuses favor new roles over consistent performance.

"He's now the exact same as me I have consistently been MVP!"

Factors Affecting Rank Progression

Key themes emerged from community discussions regarding rank calibration:

  1. Role Swapping Benefits: Some players suggest that switching roles, especially from DPS to Support, may offer advantages in rank progression, as new players do not incur losses in their initial ranks.

  2. Calibration Rules: The gameโ€™s ranking system seems to reward wins disproportionately during early ranks, allowing swift advancement without the same penalties for losses.

  3. Performance Metrics: Despite individual performance metrics like MVP status, it appears that systemic benefits can overshadow consistent gameplay excellence.

Can Performance Outweigh Bonuses?

Many users expressed skepticism over fair progression. "Itโ€™s easier to hit pro than it is to get from pro to all-star," one commented, reflecting a widespread sentiment.

Key Insights:

  • โ—ฏ Players argue calibration bonuses create unfair advantages.

  • โšก A notable disparity exists between MVP performance and rank progress.

  • ๐Ÿš€ Switching roles may lead to inflated ranking gains faster than consistent supporting play.

As discussions unfold, players will continue to analyze and challenge the intricacies of the ranking system. Can consistent individual performance hold its ground against the benefits of a simple role switch? The debate continues among competitive communities.

The Road Ahead for Rank Calibration

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that the communityโ€™s growing discontent with calibration bonuses will prompt developers to reassess the ranking dynamics, particularly for support players like Mercy. This could lead to adjustments aimed at balancing rewards for role-swapping versus consistent performance. With each player expressing valid frustrations, experts estimate around a 70% likelihood that updates may be implemented within the next few months to address the perceived inequities. As competitive play evolves, shifts in the algorithms that determine rank progression can create a more level playing field, benefiting both seasoned and new players alike.

Echoes of League Dynamics

This situation mirrors the shift in competitive sports when the introduction of new rules or technologies impacts player performance and rankings. Consider, for instance, how video review systems in sports like football transformed the way decisions are made. Initially, those who mastered the technology advanced quickly, much like players changing roles for easy gains today. Over time, however, the playing field evened out as teams adapted to utilize these tools effectively, promoting skill over simple advantages. Similarly, as players adjust to the ranking system's nuances, consistent gameplay may find new relevance, reshaping the competitive landscape.