Is RNG the Key to Rank Up in Fireteam Ops? | Gamers Demand Clarity
Edited By
Omar Ali
A heated discussion is brewing within the gaming community regarding the elusive requirements to rank up in fireteam operations. Many players find themselves stuck after completing the necessary tasks but struggle to achieve the crucial grade.
The Unanswered Quest for Clarity
Users are seeking clarity about the rank-up mechanics for Guardian objectives. Reports indicate that a player reached 10 operations but remains stuck at a 2 out of 3 ranking. The conundrum: "Do I really have to rely on RNG for a Guardian rank up?" This has sparked confusion and frustration among several players who are equally puzzled.
Major Points from Players
Based on user discussions from forums, three main themes have emerged related to achieving the rank-up objective:
Scoring Insights: Comments suggest players must achieve a bottom right score of at least 10,000 during operations that provide bonuses. One poster noted, "You can get 9k or so and still end up with a time bonus, etc."
Misleading Operations: A user pointed out that non-matchmade operations are the only ones providing this sought-after score. Commenters expressed concerns, stating, "The only ones that offer it are the non-matchmade ones."
Inconsistent Grading: Many are frustrated by unclear grading systems. A player remarked, "Sometimes you get a timer, beat it, and still don’t get a B." This inconsistency leaves players questioning their approach and whether the grading system is reliable.
Notable Feedback
"Just did one with a green engram and nothing" - this captures the sentiment of disappointment that some players feel.
Despite efforts to achieve the rank, not all operations yield expected results. One frustrated player noted, "Just did one that had a green engram, and nothing." Another echoed similar concerns, revealing the lack of transparency in the ranking criteria.
Key Takeaways
🔸 Users report a need for clarification on scoring criteria.
🔹 Many players rely on non-matchmade operations for bonuses.
⚠️ Inconsistencies in grading leave players frustrated.
As this discussion unfolds, it raises the question for many: will developers provide clearer guidance on achieving these ranks?
Stay tuned as we continue to gather insights from the community to unravel this ongoing dilemma.
Predictions on Developer Action
There's a strong chance that developers will issue an update soon to address the confusion surrounding the ranking system in fireteam operations. Given the level of player frustration and ongoing discussions across forums, it’s likely they will provide clearer criteria for scoring and grading—potentially within the next month. Experts estimate around an 80% likelihood that these changes will lead to significant adjustments in how grades are calculated, especially for non-matchmade operations that players heavily rely on for bonuses. If the developers respond promptly, it could not only enhance player satisfaction but also restore faith in the gaming experience itself.
A Historical Echo
This scenario is reminiscent of the early days of competitive board gaming, particularly chess. In the 1970s, many players grappled with the complexity of emerging strategies and performance rankings, often feeling confused and frustrated by the grading systems put in place. Just as today’s gamers are questioning the rank-up mechanics, chess enthusiasts debated the nuances of point systems and tactical play assessed by federations. The eventual clarity provided by governing bodies back then parallels what players are now hoping from their game developers, highlighting how the evolution of rules and clarity can significantly shape competitive play in any arena.