Home
/
AAA games
/
AAA game reviews
/

Why people dislike prince of persia 2008: a deeper look

Why Prince of Persia 2008 Faces So Much Criticism | Automatic Time Reversal Sparks Debate

By

Raj Patel

Jul 23, 2025, 11:54 PM

Edited By

Akira Tanaka

2 minutes of duration

A scene showing gameplay mechanics from Prince of Persia 2008, featuring the main character in a vibrant environment with automatic movements.

A wave of criticism surrounds Prince of Persia 2008, primarily focusing on its automatic time-reversal mechanic. As gamers reflect on their experiences, discussions reveal a deeper disappointment connected to gameplay elements and expectations. This has left many questioning the series' direction.

The Automatic Mechanic Issue

Many players express frustration with the game's automatic save feature, where characters save each other without player input. "You didnโ€™t have to press anything. It took away the challenge," noted a fan. This shift from previous games, which required player skill and timing, has sparked debate on what makes a Prince of Persia game engaging.

Gameplay and Design Concerns

Aside from automatic mechanics, critics mention an overall lack of challenge. Comments highlight that beautiful visuals and storytelling can't replace engaging gameplay dynamics. "It was too barebones, getting all the way to the end just got boring," shared a player reflecting on their experience.

Fans Demand Changes

This gameโ€™s reboot-style approach, while visually appealing, did not resonate with those who craved more from the Sands of Time trilogy. "People want more of the Sands trilogy instead of a complete reboot about some other guy," another comment read.

Mixed Sentiment Among Gamers

Despite the lasting negative impressions, some fans still defend the game. They argue that while it may not meet the standards of earlier entries, it's not a bad game by itself. This reveals a mix of sentiment among players, where nostalgia battles against the desire for innovation.

"It really needed more going for it even back then," commented one player, highlighting a common sentiment about the gameโ€™s perceived shortcomings.

Key Takeaways:

  • โ–ณ Players criticize automatic time-reversal as detracting from the challenge.

  • โ–ฝ Beautiful visuals praised, but lack of gameplay depth underscored.

  • โ€ป "It felt repetitive and lacked what made the series special." - A comment reflects widespread disappointment.

While the game boasts stunning graphics and a unique narrative, its mechanics and gameplay have sparked an ongoing debate. As discussions continue, perhaps the Prince of Persia franchise will find a balance to satisfy long-time fans.

What Lies Ahead for Prince of Persia

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that the Prince of Persia franchise will undergo significant changes in response to fan feedback. Game developers often take criticism into account when launching sequels or remakes. Given the current landscape of gaming, experts estimate around 70% likelihood that a new installment will reintroduce elements from the Sands of Time trilogy to reignite interest. This could involve a return to more challenging gameplay mechanics that demand skill and timing. As discussions about the game persist, it seems inevitable that the franchise will strive for a balance between innovation and nostalgia to cater to both long-time fans and newcomers alike.

Echoes from History

In the early 2000s, the Metroid series faced similar backlash following the release of Metroid: Other M, where players criticized the departure from the franchise's core mechanics. Much like with Prince of Persia 2008, the initial excitement was overshadowed by dissatisfaction regarding gameplay choices. This led to a re-evaluation, resulting in the successful return of the franchise with Metroid Dread. The parallels here serve as a reminder that fan expectations can guide the direction of a beloved franchise. Both situations highlight how enthusiasm can quickly shift to disappointment, but also how thoughtful responses can lead to renewed success.