Home
/
Gaming news
/
Hardware updates
/

Key updates on remote play resolution improvement

Remote Play Resolution Update | Users Clash Over Streaming Quality

By

Raj Patel

May 18, 2025, 05:43 AM

Edited By

Alex

Updated

May 18, 2025, 08:41 PM

2 minutes of duration

A gamer enjoying enhanced remote play on a console, displaying a clear and vibrant screen showing gameplay.
popular

Gamers are raising strong objections to remote play resolution, questioning the performance of the xCloud streaming service. Recent comments on forums highlight a growing division among players over the platform's reliability and effectiveness.

User Evaluations of xCloud Performance

Feedback indicates escalating dissatisfaction with xCloud's performance, particularly when using Wi-Fi. One user stated, "Wi-Fi is inherently laggy," underscoring the recommendation to use Ethernet for better connectivity. But many still find themselves questioning whether Wi-Fi truly poses the main problem.

A user shared an impressive experience, claiming to play in "1080p high-quality at 60fps" using Better xCloud, thanks to a robust setup, including a Wi-Fi 6E connection. However, others counter this with less favorable remarks, highlighting that despite optimizations, xCloud does not meet expectations. "XCloud is running off Series S hardware," remarked one gamer, emphasizing perceived limitations.

Differing Views on Streaming Quality

While some enjoy seamless sessions in action-packed games like Forza Motorsport 2023, many criticized xCloud as โ€œthe worst streaming service in terms of performance.โ€ This frustration is echoed by others who prefer alternatives like GeForce Now, expressing confidence in the latter's superior quality.

"If xCloud isnโ€™t up to par, try another service," one commenter advised. Others noted a notable difference, with one user confidently stating, "Iโ€™m playing GeForce Now and wonโ€™t go back to xCloud ever."

The Bigger Picture

Many of the comments hint at three significant issues affecting player experiences:

  • Connection Quality: A stable internet connection is crucial for smooth gameplay.

  • Comparative Performance: Users consistently point out that platforms like GeForce Now provide better image quality and lower latency.

  • Session Length and Costs: Commenters expressed frustration with session lengths and queue times, calling the service less viable over time.

"MS is advertising xCloud on large smart TVs, yet only offering streaming in 1080p," one user noted, highlighting the gap between marketing claims and user experiences.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿ”ป Many players advocate for high-speed connections and Ethernet over Wi-Fi.

  • ๐ŸŽฎ "Alternatives outperform xCloud in quality", per several comments.

  • โณ Users are questioning session lengths versus value for money.

As the environment shifts, evaluative feedback from players plays a crucial role in prompting potential upgrades to streaming services. With competitors gaining traction, many analysts anticipate that companies like Microsoft might need to reevaluate their offerings to retain relevance.

Anticipated Shifts in Streaming Services

The dialogue surrounding streaming performance is likely mounting. Experts suggest a 60% chance that xCloud will see advancements in the coming year. As demand for superior remote play increases, gaming companies might explore collaborations with internet providers to enhance service delivery.

Reflections on Tech Progression

The situation echoes challenges faced by early smartphone developers navigating connectivity issues. Like those tech pioneers had to adapt or risk being left behind, gaming services must heed player feedback to succeed in a competitive market.

As the conversation advances, it will be crucial for stakeholders to monitor these developments closely.