Home
/
AAA games
/
Developer insights
/

Results from the shuffle function on blast's major simulator

Blast's Major Simulator Shuffle Stirs Debate | A Comedy of Errors in Rankings

By

Zainab Ahmed

Jun 12, 2025, 10:49 AM

Edited By

Carlos Gomez

Updated

Jun 12, 2025, 12:55 PM

2 minutes of duration

A visual representation of Blast's major simulator displaying the results from the shuffle function test, highlighting performance metrics.
popular

A recent test of the shuffle function on Blast's major gaming simulator has become a hot topic among fans, with unexpected team rankings triggering both laughter and frustration. The performance of 'Ultimates' was particularly criticized, as they sit at the bottom with a 0-3 record, further igniting conversations about the fairness of the ranking system.

Shuffle Function: Insights and Reactions

The shuffle function has generated mixed reactions. Fans are questioning the integrity of team rankings, causing widespread debate about the underlying algorithm. Some comments even reflect on the play results being comically improbable.

Key Themes from User Feedback

  1. Bizarre Team Performances:

    Fans noted unexpected outcomes, with comments such as "NRG losing to GenG, foot, and Wildcard is a hilarious run". Another user added, "Even funnier is FUT beating NRG and Dignitas but losing in round 5."

  2. Questioning System Integrity:

    Some players are still baffled about the shuffle results. As one user pointed out, โ€œI clicked on shuffle a couple of times with my eyes closed and no way I got Geng going 3-0 in Swiss.โ€ This humor underscored the perceived randomness of outcomes, raising concerns about the algorithm.

  3. Notable Players Shining:

    Positive mentions were made of individual performances, particularly Torsos, with a commenter noting, "Torsos singlehandedly carries Wildcard through a lower bracket run." This highlights that while team struggles exist, individual talent still shines through.

Noteworthy Quotes

"Kinda dumb programming decision if thatโ€™s the case. It should take an average for each team."

"I swear I didn't rig this."

With sentiment ranging from confusion to humor, fans seemingly accept this shuffle as a part of the gaming journey, albeit with a desire for a clearer ranking system.

Highlights of the Discussion

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Ultimates remain at 0-3 in rankings, causing disbelief.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Calls for transparency in community rankings continue to rise.

  • ๐Ÿค” Players identify individual brilliance, notably from Torsos, amidst team failures.

What Lies Ahead for Rankings?

Chat around the rankings system will likely prompt developers to reassess their algorithms. Many believe a shift towards a more transparent ranking method incorporating averages could be on the horizon. Given the chatter online, such changes may occur in the next patch update.

Learning from the Past

This situation recalls the early days of professional basketball, where outdated ranking systems often led to drastic inconsistencies. Just as basketball evolved through better metrics, gaming systems like these face similar calls for evolution. Fans desire a more accurate reflection of team performance, aiming for fairness in gameplay akin to the growth seen in traditional sports.