Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Sg1 content removal sparks outrage amid sg2 slowdown

Splitgate Community Reacts | Shutdown of SG1 Sparks Outcry Amid SG2's Slow Content Rollout

By

Maximilian Schubert

Jul 23, 2025, 09:58 PM

3 minutes of duration

Group of gamers showing frustration over SG1 content being removed during SG2 slowdown
popular

A significant backlash is brewing as the Splitgate community reacts to the recent shutdown of Splitgate 1 (SG1). Concerned gamers fear this move could lead to further diminishing player engagement in Splitgate 2 (SG2).

The Heart of the Controversy

Players express strong feelings over the decision to take down SG1, especially with SG2 currently experiencing a slowdown in content updates. Many believe this could push some fans to abandon the franchise altogether. The popularity of SG1 was a bright spot in the community, and its closure raises questions about the future health of SG2.

โ€œWhen you shut down a beloved game while the new one stumbles, what are you leaving for the fans?โ€ one user commented. Another pointed out, "They WILL lose fans from this decision."

Mixed Responses from the Gamers

While many players are frustrated, others support the developers' vision for a revamped SG2. Here are the main points from the ongoing discussion:

  • Dwindling Player Counts: Many fans acknowledge that SG1 had peaked at around 1,000 players, an insignificant number when compared to the potential audience for SG2. Some say it was simply not sustainable.

  • Resource Allocation: Supporters of the shutdown argue that the developers need to allocate resources effectively. โ€œSG1 generates no revenue for them. They are a business that needs to focus their resources,โ€ stated one player.

  • OG Playlist Future: Fans are hopeful that the Original Game (OG) playlist will stand as a permanent feature post-launch, helping bridge the gap for those missing the first game.

Community Sentiment

The overall sentiment is largely negative regarding the shutdown, particularly given the ongoing issues with SG2โ€™s player engagement. One user revealed, โ€œItโ€™s going to slow down for a while,โ€ referencing the developersโ€™ announcement of no major updates this year.

"They mustโ€™ve been planning to close the game for a while," noted one concerned player, hinting at a lack of transparency from developers.

Key Takeaways

  • โ˜ฃ๏ธ SG1 Shutdown: Sparking frustration and disappointment in the community

  • ๐ŸŽฎ Player Count: SG1 had dwindled to around 100 active players while SG2 hovers around 1,600

  • โณ Future Updates: SG2 will see no major updates after Chapter 3 in 2025, leading to concerns about player engagement

As gamers navigate this turbulent period for the franchise, both players and developers will need to find common ground to keep the Splitgate community alive and thriving.

What Lies Ahead for Splitgate

As the Splitgate community grapples with the aftermath of SG1's shutdown, predictions for SG2's future vary. There's a strong chance that if player engagement does not improve in the coming months, the developers may reconsider the pace of their content rollout for SG2. Experts estimate around 60% of the game's active players could potentially taper off if no major updates or significant enhancements are introduced by mid-2025. With unresolved concerns about gameplay quality and community integrity, the next few quarters will likely be crucial for the franchise's survival, requiring both player loyalty and a solid roadmap from developers.

A Unique Reflection on Similar Resilience

Looking back, the scenario draws parallels to the rise and fall of other gaming franchises that faced similar crossroads. Consider the transition from titles like Team Fortress Classic to Team Fortress 2, where the community initially resisted change. Just like now, developers had to reclaim trust from their player base after a significant shift. However, they did this by addressing player concerns directly and delivering consistent updates, ultimately leading to widespread acclaim. This shows that navigating through discontent with transparency could revitalize feelings of loyalty, reminding us that sometimes, the key to survival lies not in the games themselves but in the connection forged with those who play them.