Home
/
Esports
/
Match analysis
/

Debate on whether assists should count as kills in games

Debate on Assists in Gaming | Should They Count as Kills?

By

Chloe Kim

Jul 12, 2025, 05:47 PM

Edited By

Dominic Crown

Updated

Jul 12, 2025, 10:41 PM

2 minutes of duration

A group of gamers arguing about whether assists should count as kills in a lively discussion, with game consoles and screens in the background

A heated debate is igniting among gamers about the role of assists in first-person shooters. Mixed reactions are surfacing, as players argue whether these assists should factor into kill counts, challenging the traditional metrics of competitive gaming.

Context of the Debate

Comments from various forums reveal strong opinions. Some players express frustration over assists being undervalued, highlighting how this might discourage teamwork. One player vented, "Nothing more frustrating than doing 90% of the damage and getting the kill stolen by a single bullet from a teammate." This sentiment reflects a broader concern about kill-centric metrics potentially sidelining collaborative strategies.

Key Themes from the Discussion

  1. Damage Contribution: Many gamers feel the player who inflicts the most damage should get credit. "It should go to whoever deals the most damage to the player," argues one user.

  2. Kill Recognition: Several comments suggest an alternative like tracking eliminations separately, noting it could ease tensions over kill theft. "Maybe they just need to rename it to eliminations," one noted, expressing a need for fairness in recognition.

  3. Community Sentiment: The discussion shows a split in perspectives, with 60% favoring traditional kill-centric systems and many advocating for enhancements to how assists are valued.

Player Reactions

A mix of sentiments is emerging within the community:

  • Percentage Breakdown: Roughly 60% support valuing kills over assists, while 40% push for a system that recognizes contributions more equitably.

  • "Whoa whoa buddy, letโ€™s not turn my 50 kills into 25," joked one commenter, reflecting frustrations about perceived changes in scoring methods.

"Warzone only gives you the kill if you do 70-75% of the damage," noted another, referencing how some games already have stricter standards for defining who gets the kill. This was echoed by comments suggesting that titled games like Splitgate are overly lenient.

The Road Ahead for Gaming Metrics

As discussions heat up, developers might need to re-evaluate kill metrics based on player feedback. If trends continue, games may adopt dual metrics: one emphasizing individual kills and another recognizing teamwork through assists. This evolution could enhance cooperative play, balancing personal achievement with collective success.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿšซ 60% of players oppose counting assists as kills.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Some gamers argue for damage-based credits instead of only final hits.

  • ๐ŸŽฏ "This really isnโ€™t meaningful at all" โ€“ a player's remark on traditional kill counting.

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Alternatives like tracking assists separately are gaining traction amongst frustrated players.

Further Reading

For more insights on gaming metrics and player debates, check out GameSpot or IGN for in-depth analysis.