Edited By
Clara Evers
In the ongoing discussions about gaming meta, players in mid-diamond ranks are calling out Sigma tank players for excessive caution. A rising trend shows these players backing off in skirmishes, leading to a pattern of lost games despite racking up high damage totals.
Many gamers are pointing out that Sigma, intended to be a poke tank, is often seen retreating at the faintest hint of damage. "I've seen Sigmas with over 25k damage lose games because they won't contest objectives or initiate fights," one player expressed. Their unwillingness to engage in brawls leaves teams vulnerable and frustrated.
The sentiment among players indicates a mix of understanding and frustration. Some argue that teammates need to step up their damage output for Sigma to be effective. One noted, "Having DPS that donโt do enough damage just makes me completely useless."
Conversely, players also acknowledge that Sigma's current state limits his effectiveness in fights. "Power creep has taken a toll," another player mentioned, suggesting that Sigma isn't strong enough to fully engage at high levels without endangering himself.
A common theme in the commentary highlights the toxicity faced by tank players. One user remarked, "If you die brawling because no one on the team helped you, you often get flamed." This suggests a reluctance among players to risk engagement due to fear of blame.
"They back up because they could be at full health and explode next second if not careful," another comment noted, reflecting a broader recognition of Sigma's vulnerabilities.
Retreating Trend: Sigma players are increasingly hesitant to engage, leading to team struggles.
Team Dependency: Successful brawling requires effective DPS support; a lack of damage output hinders Sigma's performance.
Tank Toxicity: Players feel pressured not to engage proactively due to potential backlash from teammates.
Overall, Sigma players' reluctance to aggress in fights is raising eyebrows in mid-diamond ranks. This behavior is impacting game outcomes, causing teams to fall short of victory despite high individual damage.
๐น Many Sigma players retreat at the first sign of damage.
๐น Game dynamics often leave tanks feeling unable to engage without support.
๐น Toxicity within team ranks discourages proactive play from tank characters.
As the game evolves, will Sigma find a better spot in the meta, or are players too afraid of damage to change their playstyle?
Experts estimate around a 65% chance that Sigma's playstyle will evolve as more players experiment with aggressive tactics. As teams begin to understand the necessity of DPS synergy, Sigma tanks may gradually shift from a defensive strategy to a more assertive one. The rise of community guides and discussions on forums about adapting gameplay will likely encourage Sigma players to engage more often in skirmishes. Additionally, a potential balance adjustment from developers could reinforce this shift, making Sigma a more viable option during crucial phases of combat.
In a surprising parallel, the evolution of soccer tactics during the late 1970s reflects the current Sigma dilemma. At that time, many teams adopted a defensive posture, prioritizing ball possession over aggressive plays. The shift in mindset didnโt occur until teams like Brazil introduced a more dynamic attacking style that remained effective under pressure. Similarly, Sigma players today may find that taking risks and engaging in battles could yield greater rewards in the long run, just as those soccer teams discovered a path to victory by abandoning excessive caution.