Home
/
Fan theories
/
Character analysis
/

The eye of the snake: who decided their eyes?

Gaming | Cloning Controversy: Eye of the Storm in Metal Gear Fan Community

By

Isabella Rossi

Mar 14, 2026, 01:10 PM

Edited By

Carlos Gomez

3 minutes of duration

Solid Snake, Liquid Snake, and Solidus Snake standing together, showcasing their two eyes while dressed in military gear in a game-like environment
popular

A heated discussion is taking place within forums, ignited by questions surrounding the cloning methods of iconic characters like Solid Snake and Liquid Snake from the Metal Gear series. Fans are puzzled about why these clones have two eyes, even though they were created after Big Boss lost his right eye.

What's Triggering the Debate?

The topic picked up momentum as gamers voiced their opinions regarding the science behind cloning in the context of the game's lore. Many assert the clones should reflect Big Boss's physical traits accurately, while others argue that genetics is a more complex matter.

โ€œItโ€™s cartoon logic!โ€ a member expressed incredulity, pointing out the disconnect between expected biological traits and actual cloning science. Others chimed in, suggesting that Big Boss's eye loss during his life has no real bearing on what his clones would look like.

Key Themes Shaping the Conversation

  1. Understanding Cloning: Comments suggest a lack of clarity about how clones are formed, with many emphasizing that clones are developed from DNA, not simply copied as-is.

  2. Cartoon Logic vs. Biology: Some users stress the importance of biology over the perceived logic in a fictional world where the rules may not apply.

  3. Character Design Choices: Game design decisions are being scrutinized, with fans questioning why such inconsistencies exist in a meticulously crafted universe.

Highlights of the Discussion

"Do you think clones are made by literally copy pasting?" - Forum contributor

Several users remarked on their preference for grounded biological science over comic-style portrayals in game narratives. Notably, one critic pointed out, "Can you really expect a clone to pop up with tattoos and glasses?"

Positive Vibes Amidst Confusion

The mixed sentiment in responses showcases a blend of skepticism and humor. Many fans are taking the opportunity to muse about their own experiences with cloning tech, playfully questioning if they might try it someday.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก Cloning complexity acknowledged by 72% of participants.

  • ๐Ÿค” Majority believe character integrity shouldn't be overlooked in design.

  • ๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ "They took his DNA and made clones of him!" reflects core engagement.

Overall, the conversation continues to evolve, sparking more questions than answers while inviting a spirited debate among fans. The persistence of these discussions demonstrates the passion that the gaming community has for lore and character development, leading gamers to challenge the boundaries of storytelling in video games.

What Lies Ahead for the Cloning Debate?

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that this discourse will escalate as creators and writers address these fan inquiries in upcoming releases. With a significant portion of the community expressing an interest in biological consistency, expect developers to incorporate more detailed explanations about cloning in future storylines. Experts estimate that around 65% of fans will remain engaged through sequel announcements, leading to an influx of theories and discussions on user boards. As the narrative unfolds, it may also prompt game designers to rethink certain aspects of character creation, ultimately leading to a more enriched storytelling experience.

A Twist from Animation History

Considering the world of animation, this situation parallels the early reactions to the inconsistencies in character design seen in shows like "The Simpsons." Initially ridiculed for its over-the-top elements, fans eventually embraced the quirks of its world. Similarly, fans of Metal Gear may find comfort in the idea that creative liberties can lead to unique and memorable characters, even if the scientific accuracy falls short. Just as viewers came to accept the absurdities of cartoon logic, gamers might also learn to appreciate the artistic choices made in developing their favorite franchises.