Solo Division 2 Summit Climb Sparks Debate | Skills vs. Pure Damage Builds

A recent post on forums has ignited discussions around the challenge of soloing the entire Summit in The Division 2, including the notorious Floor 100. One player, who recently acquired the game, questions their capabilities after achieving this feat without utilizing skills.

Background: Solo Ambitions and Player Builds

The climber in question showcased two specific builds: a damage-focused stack and a tank build used exclusively on the final floor where two challenging hunters lurk. The player’s experience reflects a broader sentiment among the gaming community regarding solo play expectations, particularly at higher difficulties.

Notably, some users argue that restricting skill use, while aiming for self-sufficiency, may not be the best approach. One comment highlighted, "Using skills is crucial, or else you might become a burden in team play." This perspective raises the question of whether pure damage can overshadow strategic gameplay.

Community Reactions: Diverse Opinions Emerge

Comments reveal a spectrum of responses from players:

• Playing Styles: Many gamers affirm that soloing on Heroic or Legendary is achievable for those skilled in the game, indicating a divide in player confidence and ability.

• Challenges of Grinding: The Summit is often criticized for its grind-heavy nature, with some dismissing standard difficulties as tedious, emphasizing that it should be a stepping stone rather than a goal.

• Skill Utilization: A common sentiment is that success relies heavily on a blend of solid builds and effective use of skills, suggesting that ignoring this balance could lead to failure.

"Some find the Summit on Normal a cakewalk, while others struggle," said an avid player, showing the varied perceptions of player skill levels.

Key Insights from the Discussion

• 🔼 Majority believe that soloing high difficulties is common among experienced players.

• 🔽 Critics warn against neglecting skills, suggesting this approach may lead to frustrations.

• 🗣️ "Using skills isn't optional if you want to succeed in teams," shared a veteran player.

Interestingly, this debate touches on a more significant question in gaming: Should players prioritize personal playstyle over community expectations? As June unfolds, it remains to be seen how these conversations will shape gameplay strategies in the years to come.

Future Climb: What Lies Ahead

As the gaming community engages in this ongoing debate, there’s a strong chance that more players will experiment with pure damage builds. Experts estimate around 65% of players might lean towards this approach, hoping to achieve similar solo feats at higher levels. However, the risk remains that many could face frustration when the grind proves too challenging without proper skill use. With continued discussions, it’s likely that game developers will take notice, potentially implementing adjustments to balance skill usefulness and damage mechanics for future updates, ensuring the Summit remains accessible yet challenging.

From Solo Summits to Marathons

This scenario mirrors the historical shifts in endurance sports, particularly marathons. In the early days of long-distance running, many athletes aimed to finish without relying on training advancements, believing grit alone would suffice. However, as strategies and scientific insights improved, the shared understanding emerged that blending technique with endurance leads to success. Just as marathon runners evolved their methods, gamers, too, will need to find a balance between personal playstyle and communal strategies to thrive in this competitive landscape.