Splatoon 3 Rated for Switch 2 in Europe | Community Division Grows
Splatoon 3 is grabbing attention with its recent rating for the Switch 2 in Europe, stirring up controversy. Gamers are left pondering the delay in updating the rating since its patch six months ago.
Context and Community Confusion
The update has sparked heated discussions about how ratings are handled post-patch. While some think this rating is a simple update, others point out that previous Nintendo titles had separate ratings for distinct versions. Why, then, is Splatoon 3 being reassessed now?
Voices from the Community
Feedback from people across various forums reflects a mix of skepticism and nostalgia:
Map Design Issues: "I was being one-shotted almost on respawn–often by power-ups I didn’t even understand."
Art Style Critique: "They replaced funky 90s vibes with generic rock music and aesthetics."
Matchmaking Concerns: "If a casual player wins, another loses. It’s not unique to Splatoon 3, but the matchmaking feels harsh."
Interestingly, one commenter speculated, "Why Splatoon got that rating today, I have no idea; they likely just used 2025-12-31 as a placeholder date."
Mixed Sentiment and Future Expectations
Across the board, remarks show a notable degree of frustration. Most prominently, players are voicing a desire for more updates to the original Splatoon 2, arguing that resources might be better spent there:
"Effort would be better spent patching Splatoon 2 rather than focusing on rebranding a game."
Community members call for new kits and maps beyond just a rating increase. They are eager for substantial content rather than a mere administrative adjustment.
Potential Impact of the Rating
Looking ahead, experts see around a 70% chance that Nintendo will use this rating to launch significant DLCs. Given the positive feedback on gyro aiming, it might enhance gameplay, leading to improved user experiences. However, if this rating does nothing beyond a technicality, players may push for more patches on Splatoon 2; estimates show a 50% likelihood of this happening soon.
Historical Echoes in Gaming
This scenario echoes the 2013 rebranding of Tomb Raider. Initially met with doubt, that title ultimately thrived due to updated features attracting both new players and loyal fans. Similarly, the responses today could guide Nintendo's strategy for future updates, reflecting the community's ongoing thirst for engaging gaming experiences.
Key Insights
🚫 Many gamers question the necessity of a separate rating.
🎮 Matchmaking and map design are hot topics for improvement.
🌍 Community enthusiasm around potential DLC is palpable, although rooted in skepticism.
As this story unfolds, all eyes will be on Nintendo. Will the rating for Splatoon 3 lead to meaningful updates, or is it just another procedural adjustment?