Home
/
AAA games
/
Game expansions
/

Veteran gamers demand expansion of stash limits

Storage Space Showdown | Players Call for Larger Stash Size

By

Liam Johnson

Jan 7, 2026, 04:13 AM

Edited By

Clara Evers

3 minutes of duration

A group of veteran gamers talks about stash limits with a game interface showing items and a stash
popular

Concerns are rising among gamers as complaints surface about limited storage space in a popular extraction looter shooter. Many gamers, particularly those claiming veteran status, argue that the current stash size of 280 slots is insufficient for the gameโ€™s extensive collection system.

Veterans Weigh In

A number of dedicated players voiced frustrations on forums, emphasizing that the game's design encourages collecting a variety of items. As one commenter stated, "the current stash of 280 is far too small for everything this game allows you to collect." They demand an increase to 400 slots.

Interestingly, this call for a larger stash comes amid conflicting opinions about the game's current inventory management system. One forum participant noted, "No, you need better inventory management." This sentiment suggests some believe players are hoarding unnecessary items rather than efficiently managing their resources.

Expeditions and Permanent Slots

Another heated point in the discussion centers around the recent introduction of expeditions. Many feel that the additional 12 slots offered through this feature are inadequate, especially given the temporary nature of rewards. "No, I will not do your expedition for a measly 12 extra slots that only last 2 months," remarked one veteran. However, others clarified that the slots are permanent and stack, a detail some players seemed to overlook.

Yet, a solid compromise proposed is implementing a marketplace feature. This would allow players to store their items in credit form rather than physical inventory space, a system found in many other similar games.

Gamers' Sentiment and Suggestions

Despite the push for increased storage, some players argue that managing a smaller stash promotes strategic gameplay. As one user pointed out, "Itโ€™s the gear fear People hold a good 1/4 of their stash and never use it because they donโ€™t want to lose it."

The sentiment among players is mixed; while many demand more space, others advocate for improved inventory organization instead.

Key Takeaways

  • โœฆ Many players demand a larger stash size, claiming 400 slots would be ideal.

  • โœฆ Some argue that efficient inventory management is more critical than expanding storage.

  • โœฆ Proposals include adding a marketplace for item storage, a feature common in other games.

The ongoing debate highlights a significant conflict in the gaming community regarding storage limitations and management. As the game evolves, will developers listen to these calls for change?

Predictions on the Horizon

Thereโ€™s a solid chance developers will take player feedback seriously and consider expanding the stash size in future updates. Given the growing number of voices advocating for larger storage, itโ€™s likely that weโ€™ll see an increase to around 350 slotsโ€”possibly as soon as the next major patch. Developers might push for improvements in inventory management as well, allowing for better organization without sacrificing space. This balanced approach could lead to a win-win scenario for both sides, with around a 70% probability of such measures being implemented within the next few months.

Echoes from the Gaming Past

Reflecting on the evolution of RPGs, one can draw an unexpected parallel between the stash debates and the early MMO inventory systems that once frustrated players. Much like the clamor for additional bag space in those days, gaming communities rallied with similar gusto around other issues; for instance, World of Warcraft's inventory limits sparked numerous discussions. Developers found that creating options for item management not only resolved player complaints but also enriched the gameplay experience. This precedent suggests that listening to players isn't merely a means to quell dissent but a way to foster innovation, driving games toward new horizons.