
A new offline mode for The Crew 2 has stirred diverse reactions among the gaming community. While some players embrace the change, others criticize its limitations amid ongoing calls for broader legal requirements for offline functionality in gaming.
The announcement has sparked debates reflecting wider concerns about game preservation and accessibility. The push for offline capabilities appears driven by past issues, notably the shutdown of The Crew 1's servers, which raised questions about consumer rights.
"This is a result of the backlash against the closure of Crew 1's servers, but credit where it's due," a player remarked. "The backlash deserves credit for giving some power back to consumers. Any move that makes Ubisoft more cautious is valuable."
Calls for Legal Changes
Many players advocate for a legal framework ensuring offline access in future titles. "The Stop Killing Games campaign aims to make it a legal requirement," stated one enthusiastic member, emphasizing the urgency of sustained action.
Frustration Over Past Titles
The sentiment surrounding offline options for former games like The Crew 1 remains strong. "I respectfully donโt give a shit. The Crew 1 needs an offline version," one frustrated gamer commented, echoing a common theme.
Gameplay Comparisons
Players are comparing both titles passionately. One comment noted, "The Crew 2 is worse in some ways than The Crew 1. They arenโt the same game at all." Another said, "The Crew 2 at launch was a bit of a misfire, but the game got a crazy amount of updates over the years, and now the activities available are staggering."
โ๏ธ Many advocate for legal requirements for offline modes in future games.
๐ Continuous frustration exists regarding the absence of offline versions of earlier titles.
๐ The significant updates to The Crew 2 have amplified community interest and engagement.
As The Crew 2 rolls out its offline mode, the implications for game preservation and player rights resonate through the community. How will developers respond to these evolving demands for accessibility?