Edited By
Marco Silva
In the fast-paced world of gaming, a debate is brewing about the viability of The Finals as a competitive shooter. Recent comments from players highlight frustrations surrounding gameplay balance, raising questions about its potential as an esports title.
Players express frustration over the competitive balance, particularly during Open Qualifier: Phase 2. Many claim that overpowering combinations of gear lead to predictable wins, especially when teams leverage identical loadouts. "The same abilities and weapons in one team is too op," noted one frustrated player.
Gamers took to forums to voice their opinions, revealing a mix of sentiments:
Counter Strategies: Some users argued that there are effective counters to popular weapon combinations. โHonestly countless ways to counter that..โ said one player, emphasizing the importance of adapting to the meta.
Quality Issues: Others criticized Embark Studios, claiming the developers have been unresponsive to ongoing server quality concerns. One user aptly remarked, โIt's a dream to make this game into an e-sports gameโ
Frustration Over Winning Strategies: Comments also featured players questioning how to counter high-damage weapons, like M60, when spammed effectively. โ2 H with M60 whoโs spammingโฆ any ideas how to defeat them?โ
As the community navigates these balance issues, it remains unclear if The Finals can secure a place in the esports arena. Can the developers address gameplay complaints swiftly enough to foster a competitive scene? Only time will tell.
๐จ Many players believe balance issues plague competitive gameplay.
๐ง Counter strategies are available but not widely known.
๐ฎ Community frustration includes server quality and lack of developer response.
The discourse around The Finals may highlight broader concerns in competitive gaming environments. Addressing these player issues may be crucial for its future viability in esports.
Thereโs a strong chance that The Finals developers will make necessary adjustments, focusing on balance issues raised by players during competitive events. Given the nature of the gaming community and the pressure for a competitive scene, experts estimate a 70% likelihood that the developers will roll out updates within the next few months. These updates could aim at both weapon balancing and improving server quality, essential steps to earn back player trust. If they succeed, we could see an emerging esports title that, unlike many others, builds a competitive community bent on sharing strategies and adapting to an evolving meta.
The situation mirrors the early days of online multiplayer games, particularly Team Fortress 2, where emerging classes and weapons led to community uproar and imbalance. Just like The Finals, players then expressed frustration through forums, raising concerns about game mechanics. Developers took notice and made adjustments, transforming it into a thriving scene with beloved tournaments over time. If history is any guide, timely responses to player feedback can turn perceived shortcomings into growing opportunities.