Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Three heroes bans instead of four: a bold move

New Banning Rules Confuse Players | Three Heroes Banned Instead of Four

By

Nina Patel

Jul 17, 2025, 04:02 PM

Edited By

Emily Johnson

2 minutes of duration

Illustration of three hero icons depicted with a red ban symbol over them, representing the news about bans in a popular game.

Recent changes in the banning system for heroes in esports games have left many players scratching their heads. On July 17, a wave of confusion spread across forums when users noticed that only three heroes could be banned instead of the expected four.

Players expressed their bewilderment about the recent update. "Before the last update you could ban 3 DPS," remarked one individual, pointing to prior rules that seemed more flexible. Comments from others indicate that the new rules restrict teams to banning only two heroes from the same role, sparking discussions about strategy and fairness in competitive play.

The New Banning Rules Explained

The new system means that each team can ban:

  • Two heroes from the same role (Tanks, DPS, or Supports)

  • Plus one additional hero from any role

This has led to debate among players over whether the changes enhance gameplay or complicate it without clear benefit.

Key Themes Emerging from Player Feedback

  1. Game Balance: Many believe the new rules could disrupt game balance by limiting strategy options.

  2. Competitive Fairness: Players are concerned about fairness in banning selections, as teams might not be able to eliminate their top threats.

  3. Increased Confusion: Some players feel more frustrated due to unclear rules and their frequent changes.

"Happens pretty often to me," expressed another player echoing similar frustrations about the consistency of game rules.

Public Sentiment

While many players are confused and some appear frustrated, a few welcome the opportunity for strategic depth. However, the majority sentiment leans toward a mixed bag of negative feedback regarding these new constraints.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Previous rules allowed more flexibility: Players recall past systems enabling a broader bandwidth for bans.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Frustration over unclear mechanics: Many comment on frequent changes leading to uncertainty in gameplay.

  • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ "Enemy team must have voted" suggests another player's insight into the mechanics changing how bans are voted.

As players navigate this new landscape of banned heroes, questions linger about the effectiveness and purpose of these changes. Will the esports community adapt, or will further adjustments be required?

What Lies Ahead for Bans in Esports

Thereโ€™s a strong chance the esports community will seek adjustments to the new banning rules in the coming months. Player feedback is likely to push developers to reconsider the recent changes, especially given the overwhelming sentiment against the constraints. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that teams will advocate for a return to more flexible bans as they gather insights from ongoing matches. This could lead to a swift reversal or modifications that balance gameplay without further frustrating the players. As competitive integrity becomes a central focus, developers might introduce tools or analytics to help teams refine their strategies further without the current restrictions.

Echoes of History in the Gaming Realm

Thinking back to team sports, one can liken this situation to the 1970s in baseball when the designated hitter rule sparked heated discussions among players and fans. While the change aimed to bring more strategy and scoring to the game, it faced backlash from purists who felt it undermined traditional play. Just as that era witnessed a tug-of-war over rules, todayโ€™s players may mirror the same sentiment as they adapt to the new hero ban system. The gamer's struggle reflects that age-old tension between evolving strategy and nostalgia for past frameworks, drawing parallels between both sports and the ongoing evolution of gaming.