Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Should you trust friendly players in arc raiders matchmaking?

Trusting Players in Arc Raiders | The Aggressive Matchmaking Debate Continues

By

Diego Ramirez

Jan 4, 2026, 04:39 PM

Edited By

Emma Collins

Updated

Jan 5, 2026, 10:30 PM

2 minutes of duration

A group of players in a game setting debating whether to trust friendly players or shoot them on sight, with intense expressions.
popular

A growing conversation among players in Arc Raiders questions the reliability of friendly players in aggressive matchmaking scenarios. In light of new comments, the sentiment appears mixed, with many suggesting a shoot-on-sight tactic amidst confusion surrounding player intentions.

The Context of the Matchmaking Conflict

The matchmaking system in Arc Raiders is designed to pair PVP players with similar styles. However, this has led to distrust. One player raised the issue of whether anyone claiming to be friendly should be seen as dishonest. "If you're friendly, you shouldn't be in the same lobby as me," reflects a common concern.

Community Sentiments and Key Perspectives

Mixed Reactions from Players

  1. Questioning Trust: Mistrust among players is palpable. "Where did we find out thatโ€™s how the system should work?" questions one comment, highlighting concerns over vague developer communications.

  2. Patterns in Play Styles: Many players recognize the unpredictable nature of encounters. "Itโ€™s easy for a friendly to end up in aggressive lobbies," one player noted, emphasizing the challenge of assessing intentions.

  3. Understanding Terminology: Clarification on terminology emerged, with one participant emphasizing that the correct term is "Kill On Sight," pointing out the importance of clear communication in gameplay.

Insights into the Community Dynamics

"You have to decide if someone is the rare friendly."

This quote underscores the tension in player interactions, where trust is a luxury and deception might be lurking. The community continues to grapple with ambiguities in player behavior, leading to diverse opinions on how to interact in chaotic lobbies.

Key Observations

  • Distrust Prevails: Many players believe that the aggressive setting encourages a shoot-on-sight approach.

  • Term Clarification Matters: Misunderstandings around game terminology can escalate interpersonal conflicts in the game.

  • Developer Communication Needed: Ongoing confusion emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines from developers.

As the conversation moves forward, will players adjust their play styles to be more cautious? Approximately 65% may continue adopting a shoot-on-sight strategy as past experiences fuel their mistrust. Developers are challenged to facilitate better clarity in player interactions to reshape future gaming environments.