Edited By
Tanya Melton

A thought-provoking conversation has emerged among gamers regarding which notorious characters they would trust as survivors. Recent comments highlight a clear preference for Nate from Russellโs story in The Walking Dead: 400 Days.
Itโs unusual to consider a villain a trustworthy ally, yet gamers are vocalizing their opinions. The ongoing discussion stretches across user boards, revealing a surprising sentiment towards characters often labeled as immoral or dangerous.
Nate from Russellโs story is a standout choice, frequently mentioned with enthusiasm.
Norma, another character, was also suggested, indicating a competing interest among the bad apples.
Users expressed unwavering confidence in Nateโs survival skills despite his dark past.
"You just gotta trust Nate for his grit," one commenter stated.
Survivor Instincts: Many believe that Nateโs harsh experiences may contribute to his ability to navigate perilous situations.
Moral Ambiguity: The idea that a character's backstory can influence trust levels engages players' imaginations.
Fandom Attachment: Players seem drawn to the complexity of these bad characters, viewing them as more relatable in extreme scenarios.
While thereโs a mix in responses, the sentiment leans positively towards Nate. His cunning nature surfaces as a redeeming quality, eclipsing some of his more sinister traits.
๐น Gamers overwhelmingly favor Nate as a reliable survivor.
๐ธ Many find moral complexity intriguing; bad guys sometimes possess vital skills.
โ "What makes a villain worth trusting?" Some users question and analyze this trend.
๐ฌ "Nate's got those survival skills we need in the apocalypse!"
The dialogue continues to evolve as contributors debate the reliance on characters with flawed ethics in survival situations. The preferences reflect deep-rooted narratives about trust and integrityโleaving many to wonder if the best allies might lurk in the shadows.