Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Ubisoft closes newly unionized halifax studio, impacting 71 jobs

Ubisoft Closes Newly-Unionized Halifax Studio | 71 Jobs at Risk

By

Jordan Miles

Jan 8, 2026, 04:10 PM

Edited By

James Lee

2 minutes of duration

A group of 71 people standing outside the Ubisoft Halifax studio, looking concerned about their job loss after the closure announcement.
popular

Ubisoft has announced the closure of its Halifax studio, impacting 71 employees. The decision comes just after the studio successfully unionized, raising questions about corporate ethics in the gaming industry.

A Sudden Shift

The closure has sparked criticism among employees and industry observers. Users on forums express their dissatisfaction, revealing divisions within the community regarding this corporate decision. "I don't think Yves Guillemot knows what the hell he's doing now," one commenter stated, reflecting a growing frustration with the company's leadership. The studio's closure follows concerns about the companyโ€™s commitment to its workforce, especially after it has actively promoted Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Understanding the Fallout

Employees and advocates are questioning the company's motives following the successful unionization. Some comments underline a sense of betrayal, with numerous users alleging that DEI efforts are merely performance rather than a genuine commitment to employee rights. "DEI is only a ploy, and most people open their mouths in shock when they see corporations throw out this pinkwashed stuff at them," read another comment. The timing raises eyebrowsโ€”closing a studio just after union efforts signal a conflict between corporate interests and employee rights.

What's Next for Affected Employees?

The future for those affected remains uncertain. Many employees are now left wondering about their next steps in the wake of this decision. While some users voice hope for other opportunities, the overall sentiment appears negative, with many expressing disbelief at the company's choices.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ 71 jobs lost due to closing of Halifax studio.

  • โŒ Unionization efforts raise significant concerns about corporate ethics.

  • ๐Ÿ” "DEI efforts seem disingenuous" - recurring theme in user comments.

The closure of the newly-unionized studio not only puts jobs at stake but raises essential questions about Ubisoft's future commitment to its employees. Will this move impact their reputation, or does it reflect a broader trend in corporate practices? Stay tuned for updates.

Future Scenarios for Ubisoft

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that Ubisoft will face intensified scrutiny and backlash as this story continues to unfold. With unionization efforts now under fire, employees at other studios may become more vocal or organized in response, potentially prompting further unionization drives across the gaming sector. Experts estimate around a 60% likelihood that we will see a wave of protests and calls for accountability in the upcoming months. The company might either double down on its current strategy or attempt damage control through more transparent communication about its DEI policies and better support for its workforce. However, if the corporation chooses to ignore the growing dissatisfaction, it risks deepening the divide between management and employees, potentially leading to further turnover and tarnished public perception.

A Surprising Echo from the Past

In a less obvious parallel, consider the story of the British Leyland car manufacturer in the 1970s. As the company was struggling to adapt to market demands, it initially engaged in superficial diversity strategies aimed at boosting morale. Yet, these efforts were viewed as insincere and merely attempts to maintain corporate image while substantial layoffs occurred. Just as in Ubisoft's case, this led to the fragmentation of workforce loyalty and a cycle of disillusionment that ultimately harmed the brand long-term. Similar to the gaming industry today, the car manufacturing sector faced a crucial choice: genuinely commit to employee welfare or appease shareholders with short-term savings, a dilemma that could define their future.