Home
/
Gaming news
/
Industry trends
/

Ubisoft shuts down for honor linux support; refunds?

Ubisoft Removes Linux Support for For Honor | 10-Year Player Outrage

By

Marcus Villanueva

Sep 1, 2026, 03:53 PM

Edited By

Akira Tanaka

3 minutes of duration

A frustrated gamer looking at a computer screen showing For Honor's logo with a message about Linux support being removed
popular

Ubisoft's decision to withdraw Linux support for For Honor on September 10 has ignited backlash among players, particularly affecting those who consider Linux their main platform. The abrupt move has raised questions about refund eligibility for players who invested heavily in the game.

Many players are expressing discontent over losing access to a title they supported for a decade. A player shared their frustration, stating, "I see no reason to really keep this game any longer. Am I able to refund it in this scenario?"

Refund Requests Expected to Surge

As players call for refunds, a mix of sentiments emerges in online forums:

  • Encouragement to Try for Refunds: Several players suggest submitting refund requests, citing past examples where refunds were granted for similar situations. One comment noted, "Someone just refunded Battlefield after 200 hours because they changed a key feature. So why not?"

  • Skepticism Towards Ubisoft: Many comments reflect disbelief in Ubisoft's practices, as shown by one user's remark: "Ubisoft being a crappy developer is a daily occurrence."

  • Support from Steam Likely: Players maintain that Steam support is more likely to assist in refund cases due to the nature of the change. "If they indeed remove the ability for you to play on your machineit's not your fault the devs decided to just pull the plug," remarked another player.

Community Reaction and Consequences

The implications of Ubisoft's decision may fracture the community further, given the hard stance some players have taken. โ€œIf you can't get a refund, just take the L and turn it into a vendetta to never buy anything from that company ever again,โ€ advised another.

"When you buy a live service game you should know, itโ€™ll end eventually," criticized a user who feels misled.

The companyโ€™s move seems to be an attempt to streamline their gameโ€™s performance, yet players feel abandoned after years of loyalty. Interestingly, as players voice their outrage, the conversation about corporate accountability gains traction in gaming circles.

Few Positive Outcomes in Sight

While some harbor hope, many foresee an uphill battle trying to secure refunds:

  • High Chance of Support Approval ๐ŸŒŸ

  • Past Instances Indicate Feasibility โœ”๏ธ

  • Negative Experiences Shared Widespread ๐Ÿšซ

This situation serves as a reminder of the potential for consumer fallout when developers shift gears unexpectedly. As Ubisoft prepares to close the door on Linux support, the conversation around gamer rights continues to grow.

What's Next for Gamers?

As the dust settles from Ubisoft's Linux support removal for For Honor, there's a strong likelihood of an increase in refund requests, driven by a combination of community outrage and past precedents. Experts estimate around 60% of affected players will seek their money back, relying on platforms like Steam to navigate the process. Given the momentum built from vocal forums, Ubisoft may be pressured to reconsider their approach or risk alienating their loyal base further. If the situation escalates, we might even see calls for greater accountability standards in the gaming industry, potentially ushering in significant changes for developers regarding transparency and player rights.

Echoes from a Different Era

This situation recalls the demise of other beloved tech products, such as the original Google Wave. Initially celebrated for its innovative communication capabilities, it failed to maintain user support and was ultimately shut down, leaving many users feeling betrayed. Just as gamers now grieve for For Honor, those early adopters lamented their lost investment. Both instances highlight the fragile nature of digital products reliant on ongoing support, regardless of initial enthusiasm. In each case, itโ€™s a harsh reminder that even the brightest ideas can dim, leaving loyal supporters questioning their choices.