By
Tina Li
Edited By
Emily Johnson

A recent surge of discussion among fans is challenging Ubisoft's stance on the relationship between its major franchises, particularly Assassin's Creed and Watch Dogs. Many gamers believe the two series share a universe, while the developer insists on labeling crossovers as mere fan service. This debate continues to stir controversy in 2025.
With Watch Dogs: Legion featuring Assassin's Creed character Darcy, many enthusiasts expected an official acknowledgment of the shared universe. Instead, Ubisoft termed her inclusion as just fan service. This dismissal sparked outrage, with fans arguing that connections between these franchises could elevate storytelling.
"The universe is absolutely shared," said one commenter. โJust because the Animus isnโt mentioned doesnโt mean itโs not happening.โ
Shared Universe Belief: Many argue that the Assassin's Creed, Watch Dogs, Splinter Cell, and other series are intrinsically linked.
Fan Canon: Some think that if fans believe in the connections, then those interpretations hold validity despite what developers state.
Concerns Over Complexity: There are worries that officially linking the franchises could only complicate existing lore.
Many fans express frustration with Ubisoft's reluctance to embrace these connections fully. Comments point out several cross-references, such as Abstergo's influence in both Watch Dogs and earlier Assassin's Creed titles, as compelling evidence of a shared universe. โAssassin's Creed and Watch Dogs not being in the same timeline is the only case in the gaming industry where game devs are wrong,โ declared another advocate.
Fans emphasized the numerous Easter eggs within the games; some insist on calling it a "headcanon" universe. Interestingly, a player pointed out
"One of the reasons they DONโT do it is to avoid continuity errors across different games."
Current sentiments show a blend of positive and negative reactions, with brackets of engagement around whether they value Ubisoft's storytelling capacity. Are developers shying away from complexity, or are fans simply too connected to their theories? The opposition to Ubisoft's official narrative might showcase a real division in gaming culture today.
โฆ Many fans consider connected universes a rich narrative opportunity.
โ "Theyโre just goofing off,โ reflects skepticism around Ubisoftโs intentions.
โณ Creative limitations might keep developers from fully engaging with fan theories, limiting a potentially expansive storyline.
In short, Ubisoftโs choice to brand connections as mere fan service could impact player engagement significantly. While many gamers call for a more cohesive universe, the companyโs approach leaves a lot on the table. Would a fully interconnected universe elevate the experience, or complicate it beyond measure? Only time will tell.
As the debate around Ubisoft's shared universe intensifies, there's a strong chance the company may reconsider its approach. Analysts suggest about 60% probability that Ubisoft will initiate more substantial connections between its franchises in the coming years to enhance brand loyalty. Fans' persistence and the growing demand for interconnected narratives may push the developer to evolve its strategy, leading to eventual cross-promotional content or even overarching story arcs. However, concerns regarding narrative complexity could keep them hesitant, resulting in a cautious approach that gradually introduces select links rather than an all-out narrative merging.
In reflecting on the current friction between fans and developers, we can draw an intriguing contrast with the Beatlesโ early years. A band initially keen on experimental collaborations found themselves at odds with fans craving traditional formats. Their shift from simple pop tunes to complex compositions shows how the gap between creator intent and audience expectation can lead to rich creative evolution. Similarly, Ubisoft faces a choice: embrace the complexity that gamers crave or risk losing engagement by sticking to a straightforward but potentially limiting narrative path.