Edited By
Noah Rodriguez

A recent wave of comments highlights a lively debate about the impact of jet propulsion on ultralight vehicles. As curious enthusiasts voice their opinions, questions arise about whether these boosters enhance performance or merely complicate driving experiences.
The ongoing discussions among people focus on the practicality of jet propulsion in ultralights. One commenter remarked, "The boosters feel like nitrous on some vehicles and others barely are noticeable but ultralight is the noticeable one." This sentiment points to a varied range of experiences across different vehicles.
Many people express mixed feelings about the boosters. One user bluntly stated, "Propeller is slowing you down, gotta toss it," highlighting a dissatisfaction with the current mechanics.
Commentators noted that the effect of boost varies significantly by vehicle type. There seems to be frustration that ultralights feel the impact more than jets or airplanes, which many feel do not experience any noticeable change.
Another interesting point raised is the wish for consistent booster effects across all vehicles. As one person pointed out, "I wish it actually affected ALL vehicles when you're driving."
"The weirdest thing. On jets and airplanes they don't even do anything at least from what I can tell."
Among the comments, a neutral mood prevails. While some users express negativity towards current propelling systems, others seem to appreciate the intention behind the jet propulsion concept.
๐จ "The boosters feel like nitrous on some vehicles."
โ Some contributors argue that propellers are a hindrance, advocating for their removal.
โ๏ธ Frustration exists over inconsistent effects among various vehicles, with many calling for an overhaul of design.
As discussions continue, it remains to be seen how developers will respond to these criticisms. Will the design of ultralight vehicles get an upgrade, or will these debates remain unresolved?
The conversation is heating up and is certainly one to watch!