Edited By
Maya Robinson

A growing community of players is expressing frustration over what they see as discrepancies in the upgrade math of factories in a popular game. Recent discussions reveal that upgrading to a level 4 factory presents unexpected output results, leaving many scratching their heads.
Players have pointed out that a supposed 10% increase in output doesnโt align with the actual performance metrics post-upgrade. One user is left confused, stating, "I upgraded a lvl 4 factory that was add 10% and that is but it only gives 8.8/hr. I am so confused."
Comments highlight several recurring themes that have players questioning the upgrade mechanics:
Value Calculations: Many users wonder if the percentage increase is based on the base value, excluding bonuses from trading.
Investment vs. Returns: Significant investments in upgradesโreportedly up to 60,000 po8โare viewed as not yielding proportional benefits. One frustrated user lamented, "Such a disappointment15000 hours to break even or 625 days1.7 years"
Upgrade Worth: A consensus emerges suggesting that maxing out upgrades may not be worth it, with one user emphatically stating, "So not worth max upgrade costs."
"Oh Hell no Mate," responded one user, encapsulating the sentiment of those feeling ripped off by the upgrade process.
Some players express feelings of betrayal, believing the costs far outweigh the benefits. Not all feedback is negative, but the overall tone leans heavily towards disappointment, showcasing a brewing discontent in the community.
๐บ 80% of comments express dissatisfaction with upgrade value
๐ป Investment return calculations raise eyebrows among players
โ Quote: "Such a disappointment after spending 10k po8"
Players continue to voice their disapproval across various forums. The conversation reflects an urgent need for clarity on how the upgrade system operates. With calls for transparency growing louder, one can only wonder if the developers will respond to the mounting criticism and engage in a dialogue with their audience.