
A growing number of players are voicing strong objections to trial leaderboards, citing glaring inconsistencies that undermine fair competition. A player shared their experience on user boards, expressing dismay over their ranking drop despite accumulating a significant trial score.
One frustrated player stated, "Even if I get tons of trial points Iโll just be lucky to keep my rank the same." This sentiment echoes throughout the community, highlighting a system that many believe is lacking.
Players emphasize that competing late in the week results in easier competition. As one remarked, "If you donโt participate until the weekend, itโs a completely different experience than those of us that start Tests on a Monday. Itโs horrendously unfair." This observation raises questions about the system's intended purpose.
Team selection has also come under scrutiny. "Solos canโt compete with trios," another player commented, pointing out how mismatched team dynamics skew results. Additionally, another gamer noted, "Matriarch is a bad example because it offers paltry rewards for solo play."
As dissatisfaction mounts, players are recommending sweeping changes. Suggestions range from eliminating the leaderboard altogether to redesigning the scoring system to prioritize consistent performance over sheer trial numbers. One user commented, "The whole thing should probably just be thrown out and reworked at this point."
"Trials is a broken system from the ground up," states a community member, underscoring the need for fundamental changes.
๐ Players argue the leaderboard system rewards the wrong metrics, leading to frustration.
โ๏ธ Many believe competition should be fair, emphasizing that solo players struggle against teams.
๐ A significant number of users propose a complete overhaul of the leaderboard format altogether.
As players push for reforms, the pressure mounts on developers to rethink the current system. While many believe that abolishing the leaderboards might be drastic, continued player disengagement appears to be a genuine concern.
The situation remains fluid as developers weigh community feedback. Failure to act could lead to deeper frustrations and possibly affect player retention. The community's desire for a fair and engaging environment may be just the catalyst needed to spark meaningful change.