Edited By
David Brown

A wave of concern among players has emerged regarding the direction of weapon progression in Warframe. With updates introducing various types of weapons, many players feel the system lacks consistency and clarity. Recent discussions highlight confusion around the performance and accessibility of newer weapons, as fans seek answers to what appears to be a fractured progression philosophy.
In Warframe, players used to rely on a clear hierarchy from base weapons to powerful Prime variants. However, the introduction of Prisma, Wraith, Vandal, Kuva, and Coda weapons has muddied the waters.
One player noted, "Itโs getting harder to understand what the actual design philosophy is behind weapon progression." This sentiment resonates with many, as newer models often lack noteworthy improvements.
"Some users argue the progression means absolutely nothing. Use whatever you want if it's modded right," one commenter shared.
Many new weapons, such as the Infested Lich weapons locked at Mastery Rank 17+, donโt perform as well as older options. Lower-ranked weapons often outshine high-tier ones, leaving players scratching their heads.
Another user remarked, "Not every new weapon is going to be better than the last, but it feels disjointed when updates introduce both top-tier weapons and obvious duds."
Comments reveal mixed feelings regarding weapon design consistency:
๐ "DE's philosophy seems to be, 'let players figure the rest out' with cool, interesting designs."
๐ "Recent updates feel like a roll of the dice for weapon efficiency and power."
๐ "Thereโs no clear progression. Knowing the right setups makes all weapons viable."
Despite these concerns, some players appreciate the freedom to mod weapons creatively, emphasizing the build-focused nature of the game.
โป๏ธ Performance of newer weapons often falls short, raising concerns.
โป๏ธ Community divided on whether new weapons should outclass older ones.
โป๏ธ Many players prefer the freedom of using cherished early-game weapons effectively.
Curiously, the question remains: Is this lack of clear progression intentional? While some enjoy the choices available, others desire a refined system that rewards their investment in newer weapons.