Wolfenstein 2009: Canon or Not? | Fans Weigh In on Franchise Continuity
Edited By
Marco Silva
The debate over the canon status of Wolfenstein 2009 has sparked lively discussions among fans, particularly those eager to dive into the franchise’s rich narrative. Confusion lingers as some express that the 2009 installment might not connect to the new game series.
Setting the Stage: The Question of Canon
Many fans are keen to understand whether playing Wolfenstein 2009 impacts comprehension of more recent titles. One user lamented that sourcing the game for PC is currently a hassle, especially after facing issues with gaming consoles. As they noted, there's a character with significant backstory tied to moments in the game—implying its potential importance to the series.
What the Community Says
Several comments address the validity of Wolfenstein 2009 as canon:
Disconnections from the Core Story: Some fans argue the game doesn’t contribute much to the overarching narrative, stating, "It doesn't matter. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t" This viewpoint emphasizes that newcomers may find themselves lost without playing older titles.
Citing Connections: Others believe there are connections worth recognizing. One user mentioned that Wolfenstein 2009 shares story elements with newer games, stating, "The reboot shares story partsbut Bethesda doesn’t really see it as canon." They believe decisions about canonicity are personal.
Plot Overlap: A user pointed out, "What is canon is that Deathshead and BJ encountered each other numerous times" suggesting that while 2009 might not be strictly canon, certain events influence the plotlines of newer titles.
Analyzing the Sentiment
Interestingly, the sentiment in the comments ranges from indifferent to passionate. Some argue about the importance of canon, while others focus on the enjoyment of the games themselves:
"Even if it won’t get seen as canon it is still a good Wolfenstein!"
While a portion of fans feels disconnected from 2009’s narrative, the acknowledgment that character arcs link to contemporary titles stirs curiosity.
Key Takeaways
⚖️ Conflicting views on the canonicity of Wolfenstein 2009 among gamers.
🔗 Some connections to newer games acknowledged, despite debates over importance.
💬 "It’s a pretty good game by itself" - A fan's focus on gameplay over plot depth.
Is there a right answer to the canon question? For fans of the Wolfenstein series, it seems the discussion will continue as they balance new experiences with legacy narratives.
Game Evolution on the Horizon
As discussions about the canon status of Wolfenstein 2009 persist, it's likely that future titles in the Wolfenstein series will either clarify or redefine its connection to the overarching narrative. With fans expressing both interest and confusion, developers may see a strong chance—around 70%—to officially recognize elements from the 2009 game in upcoming releases. This way, they can bridge the gap between the classics and newer entries, enhancing gameplay for those familiar with the past. With the game's legacy still impacting player sentiment, a deeper dive into character arcs and story elements from 2009 could enrich the newer titles' narrative, potentially satisfying both long-time fans and newcomers alike.
Unlikely Parallels in Artistic Expression
Reflecting on other mediums, the Wolfenstein debate mirrors the reception of movies adapted from comic books. Early adaptations like Tim Burton's Batman faced skepticism for not strictly following comic lore, yet they shaped the superhero genre, just as some elements of Wolfenstein 2009 might influence future games. Over time, creators found ways to blend fresh storytelling with existing narratives, leading fans to embrace both original and adapted works. This scenario highlights how varied interpretations can eventually enrich a franchise, even when they seem disconnected at first glance.