Home
/
AAA games
/
Community events
/

Why removed yogi's necklace sparks controversy in assault

Major Changes in Assault Mode | Yogi's Necklace Exits Amid Controversy

By

Elena Rodriguez

Jun 20, 2025, 02:41 AM

Edited By

Omar El-Sayed

3 minutes of duration

Players discussing the removal of Yogi's Necklace in a gaming forum, expressing mixed reactions.
popular

A heated debate ignites in the gaming community after the removal of Yogi's Necklace from Assault mode in Smite. Players express frustration over the timing and rationality behind the change, especially as it contrasts with past decisions regarding items like the Stone of Gaia.

What Happened?

Yogi's Necklace, a popular item among tank players, has been pulled from the game. Players are struggling to adapt, feeling that the removal hurts their frontlining abilities, particularly against mage heroes delivering significant early damage. One particular player shared, "How am I supposed to Frontline as a tank without it now? My deaths have skyrocketed!"

Player Sentiments

The removal has sparked a backlash, highlighting differing opinions on game balance:

  • Early Game Issues: Many assert Yogi's was overpowering early in the match but balanced out after ten minutes. A player noted, *"I get that Yogi's was a little too powerful, but only in the early game."

  • Item Alternatives: Some call for a return to fostering sustainability through items like Sovereignty and Heartward, as Smite 1 emphasized.

  • Game Balance Complexities: Another user pointed out that the healing effect was slightly less impactful after a ten-minute mark, suggesting a compromise like increased costs for accessibility could have been a better path.

"Just remove/lower the mana heal or increase the cost," commented another player, emphasizing the need for careful balance adjustments.

Shifting Perspectives

While many players were unhappy, some believe this change is an opportunity to explore different item builds and strategies. The timing of this removal aligns with the ongoing development in Smite, as players look for new ways to engage with the game.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿšซ Removal of Yogi's Necklace impacts tank performance, especially in early-game scenarios.

  • โณ Community divided on balancing changes, with past items like Stone of Gaia under scrutiny.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Some voices advocate for alternative methods to reach balance without eliminating key items entirely.

As the player base adjusts to these changes, one thing is for sure: the conversation surrounding item balance in Smite is far from over. Will the developers reconsider their approach, or will players find new ways to thrive in the revamped battlegrounds of their favorite game?

Shifting Dynamics Ahead

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that the developers of Smite will reassess the itemization approach based on ongoing player feedback. The backlash surrounding Yogi's Necklace is quite vocal, so adjustments to items or introduction of new alternatives could be imminent. Experts estimate around a 65% likelihood that a hotfix will come within the next few weeks, especially if the community's concerns escalate. Additionally, there could be an increase in experimental builds and discussions on player forums, with many diving into either new tank strategies or weaponizing alternative items. This removal might even motivate a push for community-driven changes if developers remain inactive on addressing these sentiments.

A Throwback to Music Evolution

Reflecting on the upheaval caused by the removal of Yogi's Necklace, itโ€™s similar to the music industryโ€™s struggles with streaming services shaking the foundations of profit and distribution. Just as artists had to reimagine their outreach and revenue streams after the rise of platforms like Spotify, gamers are now tasked with recalibrating their strategies in Smite. While some artists found innovative ways to interact with fans through merchandise and live performances, players may start experimenting with unconventional item builds to adapt to this new environment. Both instances underscore the necessity for communities to evolve creatively in the face of significant changes.